Libya and the war of the wimps
Libya demonstrates the shallowness of Western diplomacy, which has now finally alienated the Arabs, virtually to the last man. Well, almost the last man, because we're not counting the stooges in the pay of the West.
It is not a war led by people who want democracy ushered quickly in the Middle East. From the very outset it seems that Britain and France, the two countries who have been persistently tugging at America’s coattails to help them oust Muammar Gaddafi, are being led by people who are clearly overcompensating for their wimpy image.
France’s Nicolas Sarkozy clearly needs a small, successful war, just like George H. Bush needed Iraq to combat his wimp image. Sarkozy is desperate for a war for two reasons.
One, his ex-supermodel wife is known to snub him openly, especially in front of her ex-boyfriends. Two, he faces an election soon. Sarko’s image is down in the dumps and he thinks a quick war will divert public attention from his humiliation. Also, the French military, not known for any special heroics in the last 200 years, has belatedly recognised that one doesn’t have to take on the Germans or Russians to appear brave.
Small countries with smaller militaries offer more tempting targets. Besides, France hasn’t won any orders for its new fighter planes, so clips of Mirages and Rafales thundering over Libya might generate some interest, most likely from a future rebel government in the 'liberated' areas.
Britain is in a deeper hole. The once ruler of the waves is now waving the rules against its own people, with deep slashes in public amenities that will effectively reduce the country to Second World status. The nation has been mauled by the riots, a hung parliament and the recession, with the Wall Street Journal saying that 20 percent of Britons are wallowing in poverty.
It was amusing to hear Cameron imploring the US for a no-fly zone over Libya, a day after the British air force laid off 150 pilots. And remember that the once proud British Navy is down to 19 warships – that’s 281 less than India’s planned naval strength. Britain, of course, is in no position to criticise Gaddafi after palling around with him the past few years. London had even pardoned the Libyan terrorists who bombed an American jumbojet, killing over 250 people. The lure of petro dollars can make strange bedfellows. At any rate this is one of the most muddleheaded wars in a long time. Regarding the objectives of the war, Cameron declared that Gaddafi as the head of his armed forces is a legitimate target. “Absolutely not,” said his top general, Chief of Defence, David Richards.
More double standards. A UK defence spokesman said Gaddafi loyalists burned down a mosque after seizing control in Zawiyah, illustrating the “depths to which his forces are prepared to sink. This is a sign of how far Gaddafi is prepared to go and why coalition operations to protect the civilian population are so necessary”.
Oh yes, attacking mosques in Libya is a despicable act of cruelty but when Western forces do it in Iraq – as they did in 2004 in Kufra, murdering dozens of people – it is an operational necessity. And interestingly, last year there was a huge scandal over the British Army using structures on a firing range that strongly resembled mosques. The UK defence spokesman said “it was vital soldiers trained in an environment which replicated where they were deployed”.
If soldiers are trained to shoot at mosques in practise, does it take rocket science to understand that they will do so in war? It would be duh if it weren’t so tragic!
Then we have Barack Obama. While the European people, unlike their leaders, want nothing to do with the war in Libya, the majority of Americans say they want Gaddafi taken out. The clash of civilisations is pretty much evident here. For, why else would the American people want a third front, when their country is inches from an economic precipice?
Not even the most rabid Pentagon general wants to get entangled in Libya when the US military is bleeding in Iraq and Afghanistan.
So at a time when 100 million Americans are living in poverty, Obama is forced to jump into a war because the Republicans and sundry supremacists in the Western world are calling him a wimp. And finally we have the wimps in the United Nations – Russia and India, who for a warmer American embrace have allowed yet another independent country to be bombed into the stone age.
(Rakesh Krishnan Simha is a features writer at New Zealand’s leading media outfit. He has previously worked with Businessworld, India Today and Hindustan Times, and was news editor with the Financial Express.)
Libya demonstrates the shallowness of Western diplomacy, which has now finally alienated the Arabs, virtually to the last man. Well, almost the last man, because we're not counting the stooges in the pay of the West.
It is not a war led by people who want democracy ushered quickly in the Middle...
Libya demonstrates the shallowness of Western diplomacy, which has now finally alienated the Arabs, virtually to the last man. Well, almost the last man, because we're not counting the stooges in the pay of the West.
It is not a war led by people who want democracy ushered quickly in the Middle East. From the very outset it seems that Britain and France, the two countries who have been persistently tugging at America’s coattails to help them oust Muammar Gaddafi, are being led by people who are clearly overcompensating for their wimpy image.
France’s Nicolas Sarkozy clearly needs a small, successful war, just like George H. Bush needed Iraq to combat his wimp image. Sarkozy is desperate for a war for two reasons.
One, his ex-supermodel wife is known to snub him openly, especially in front of her ex-boyfriends. Two, he faces an election soon. Sarko’s image is down in the dumps and he thinks a quick war will divert public attention from his humiliation. Also, the French military, not known for any special heroics in the last 200 years, has belatedly recognised that one doesn’t have to take on the Germans or Russians to appear brave.
Small countries with smaller militaries offer more tempting targets. Besides, France hasn’t won any orders for its new fighter planes, so clips of Mirages and Rafales thundering over Libya might generate some interest, most likely from a future rebel government in the 'liberated' areas.
Britain is in a deeper hole. The once ruler of the waves is now waving the rules against its own people, with deep slashes in public amenities that will effectively reduce the country to Second World status. The nation has been mauled by the riots, a hung parliament and the recession, with the Wall Street Journal saying that 20 percent of Britons are wallowing in poverty.
It was amusing to hear Cameron imploring the US for a no-fly zone over Libya, a day after the British air force laid off 150 pilots. And remember that the once proud British Navy is down to 19 warships – that’s 281 less than India’s planned naval strength. Britain, of course, is in no position to criticise Gaddafi after palling around with him the past few years. London had even pardoned the Libyan terrorists who bombed an American jumbojet, killing over 250 people. The lure of petro dollars can make strange bedfellows. At any rate this is one of the most muddleheaded wars in a long time. Regarding the objectives of the war, Cameron declared that Gaddafi as the head of his armed forces is a legitimate target. “Absolutely not,” said his top general, Chief of Defence, David Richards.
More double standards. A UK defence spokesman said Gaddafi loyalists burned down a mosque after seizing control in Zawiyah, illustrating the “depths to which his forces are prepared to sink. This is a sign of how far Gaddafi is prepared to go and why coalition operations to protect the civilian population are so necessary”.
Oh yes, attacking mosques in Libya is a despicable act of cruelty but when Western forces do it in Iraq – as they did in 2004 in Kufra, murdering dozens of people – it is an operational necessity. And interestingly, last year there was a huge scandal over the British Army using structures on a firing range that strongly resembled mosques. The UK defence spokesman said “it was vital soldiers trained in an environment which replicated where they were deployed”.
If soldiers are trained to shoot at mosques in practise, does it take rocket science to understand that they will do so in war? It would be duh if it weren’t so tragic!
Then we have Barack Obama. While the European people, unlike their leaders, want nothing to do with the war in Libya, the majority of Americans say they want Gaddafi taken out. The clash of civilisations is pretty much evident here. For, why else would the American people want a third front, when their country is inches from an economic precipice?
Not even the most rabid Pentagon general wants to get entangled in Libya when the US military is bleeding in Iraq and Afghanistan.
So at a time when 100 million Americans are living in poverty, Obama is forced to jump into a war because the Republicans and sundry supremacists in the Western world are calling him a wimp. And finally we have the wimps in the United Nations – Russia and India, who for a warmer American embrace have allowed yet another independent country to be bombed into the stone age.
(Rakesh Krishnan Simha is a features writer at New Zealand’s leading media outfit. He has previously worked with Businessworld, India Today and Hindustan Times, and was news editor with the Financial Express.)
Leave a Comment